Competitive Analysis
SaaS boilerplate market landscape, competitor breakdown, and Roxabi's positioning gaps — February 2026
Market Overview
The SaaS boilerplate market is consolidating around two axes: stack and AI integration. Next.js owns ~45% of the market by volume. Developer frustration with Next.js complexity and Vercel lock-in is creating measurable migration momentum toward TanStack Start and other alternatives.
Roxabi's position: The only production-grade, B2B-first boilerplate built on TanStack Start + NestJS + Bun with a pre-built 10-agent AI development team. No direct competitor exists in this combination.
Competitor Breakdown
ShipFast — The Celebrity Boilerplate
Stack: Next.js + MongoDB/Supabase + Stripe + NextAuth | Price: $199–$299 one-time | Community: 7,200+
The market leader by brand recognition — driven by creator Marc Lou's 100K+ Twitter following, not technical superiority.
What they get right: Stripe integration from day one, fastest time-to-demo, personal brand trust, 7,200+ customers provide strong social proof.
Where they fall short:
- No multi-tenancy. Explicitly single-tenant only.
- No test suite.
- No AI tooling of any kind (explicitly cited as a weakness in buyer reviews).
- Update cadence slowed significantly as Marc focuses on other products.
- "Speed now, refactoring later" trade-off documented by buyers.
- Not suitable for complex B2B SaaS with organizations, teams, or RBAC.
Verdict: The default choice for solo founders building B2C micro-SaaS. Not competing with Roxabi's target persona.
Makerkit — The Serious B2B Boilerplate
Stack: Next.js 16 + React 19 + Supabase/Firebase/Prisma/Drizzle (your choice) + shadcn/ui | Price: $249 one-time
The most technically complete Next.js boilerplate for B2B SaaS. Has multi-tenancy, organization management, super admin, and MCP server.
AI features: Ships CLAUDE.md + Cursor rules + MCP server. Calls itself "AI-Agent Optimized." This is Level 1 (config files) — not an agent team.
Where they fall short:
- Still Next.js only despite claiming framework flexibility.
- "AI-optimized" = 2-3 config files. Not pre-built agents with roles and a workflow.
- No structured dev workflow (no frame→spec→plan→implement pipeline).
- No hallucination mitigation at the infrastructure level.
Verdict: Roxabi's closest feature-depth competitor. The comparison to draw on the landing page. A developer choosing between Makerkit and Roxabi is choosing between Next.js and TanStack — plus the AI agent team.
Supastarter
Stack: Next.js + Nuxt + SvelteKit variants; Supabase/Prisma; Stripe/LemonSqueezy | Price: $199–$299 one-time | Community: 700+
The framework-flexible option. Ships AI chat integrations (OpenAI, Anthropic APIs) and an agents.md file.
AI features: One agents.md file compatible with Cursor/Windsurf/Claude Code. This is Level 1 — a single config file positioned as an AI feature.
Where they fall short:
- agents.md = one file, not a specialized team.
- No dedicated backend service (API-route-only architecture, doesn't scale).
- Multi-framework offering dilutes the product focus.
- No structured dev workflow.
Verdict: Closest to acknowledging AI tooling as a feature, but lightyears from Roxabi's 10-agent team. Easy to win the comparison with a screenshot.
SaaSRock
Stack: Remix (React Router 7) + Tailwind CSS + Prisma | Price: $499 (Core) / $1,999 (Pro)
The kitchen-sink boilerplate. 25+ features: entity builder, workflows, affiliates, analytics, knowledge base, page block builder, email marketing, and more.
AI features: None documented.
Where they fall short:
- $1,999 Pro is prohibitive for indie founders.
- Remix/React Router 7 is a niche choice with smaller community.
- Feature complexity is overkill for lean B2B SaaS.
- No AI tooling at any level.
Verdict: Proves the $499+ ceiling is reachable. Confirms that serious B2B buyers will pay. Not a day-to-day competitor.
PropelKit
Stack: Next.js 14 + TypeScript | Price: $109 one-time
The most technically ambitious Next.js boilerplate for AI planning. Has an "AI Project Manager" that analyzes your idea, breaks it into phases, generates test cases.
AI features: Level 2 — AI planning UI. Not code-executing agents.
Where they fall short:
- Still Next.js only.
- "AI Project Manager" generates a plan, not a running agent team.
- No persistent agent infrastructure, no workflow orchestration.
- Budget price undercuts perceived quality.
Verdict: Interesting direction, wrong execution. Confirms market appetite for AI in boilerplates.
Others
| Product | Stack | Price | AI | Weakness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LaunchFast | Astro/Next.js/SvelteKit | $75–$99 | None | Budget tier, 70 users, no B2B depth |
| Bedrock | Next.js + GraphQL | $150–$900 | None | GraphQL is niche, relatively inactive |
| SaaS Pegasus | Python/Django | $249–$999 | CLAUDE.md rules | Different ecosystem (Python) |
The AI Level Framework
This is how the entire market maps on AI integration:
| Level | What It Is | Who Has It |
|---|---|---|
| 0 — Nothing | No AI tooling | ShipFast, LaunchFast, Bedrock, SaaSRock |
| 1 — Config files | CLAUDE.md / Cursor rules / agents.md | Makerkit, Supastarter, SaaS Pegasus |
| 2 — AI planning | AI Project Manager concept (no execution) | PropelKit |
| 3 — Full agent team | 10 specialized agents + orchestrated dev workflow | Roxabi only |
This is a category gap, not a feature gap. Roxabi doesn't "support AI better" — it ships your AI development team as product infrastructure.
Key Market Gaps Roxabi Fills
1. TanStack Start + NestJS — a greenfield position
Every major paid boilerplate is Next.js. No paid boilerplate ships TanStack Start + NestJS. This is an uncontested position in a growing segment.
Real production migration data confirms the trend:
- Inngest migrated from Next.js to TanStack Start, reducing local page load time by 83% (10-12s → 2-3s)
- TanStack Start reached Release Candidate status in late 2025 (v1.0 imminent)
- TanStack Start bundles are 30-35% smaller than Next.js equivalents
- Multiple engineering teams publicly documenting Why they left Next.js: RSC complexity, App Router confusion, Vercel lock-in
2. PostgreSQL RLS multi-tenancy — the correct architecture
Most boilerplates implement multi-tenancy at the application layer (manual WHERE tenant_id = ? filters). True PostgreSQL Row Level Security is database-enforced — data isolation is impossible to bypass even with application bugs. Almost no boilerplate ships this pre-configured.
Makerkit and Supastarter offer "basic" multi-tenancy. Roxabi's RLS is the correct B2B architecture from day one.
3. The hallucination problem — solved at the infrastructure level
Documented developer pain (DEV Community, Reddit, Indie Hackers): "By Day 4, Claude starts making mistakes — re-implementing features that exist in other files, forgetting architectural decisions."
The root cause: AI coding tools on fresh projects have no context. They guess. Results are inconsistent.
Roxabi solves this with:
- A
CLAUDE.mdthat documents every critical architectural decision - 10 specialized agent definitions that tell each agent what it owns and what it cannot touch
- 20 skill files that define exactly how each workflow step works
- A structured pipeline (frame→spec→plan→implement→review) that sequences work correctly
No competitor addresses this at the infrastructure level. This is the unique, demonstrable value of Roxabi's AI team.
Competitive Summary
| Dimension | ShipFast | Makerkit | Supastarter | SaaSRock | Roxabi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Agent Team | ❌ | CLAUDE.md only | agents.md (1 file) | ❌ | 10 specialized agents |
| Dev workflow pipeline | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | frame→spec→plan→ship |
| Stack | Next.js | Next.js | Next.js/Nuxt/Svelte | Remix | TanStack Start + NestJS |
| Multi-tenancy | ❌ | Basic | Basic | Full | PostgreSQL RLS |
| B2B readiness | MVP only | Good | Good | Excellent | Excellent |
| Dedicated backend | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | NestJS + Fastify |
| Hallucination mitigated | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | ❌ | Yes (by design) |
| Price | $199–299 | $249 | $199–299 | $499–1,999 | $299 |
| Community | 7,200+ | Large | 700+ | Medium | Building |
Research synthesized from 40+ web sources — February 2026